Evaluasi Pendidikan: Antara Konsep, Urgensi dan Efektivitasnya dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan

Authors

  • Mohamad Toha Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon
  • Munirah Munirah Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon
  • Siti Mulkiyah Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon

Keywords:

educational evaluation, educational quality, effectiveness, quality assurance, formative–summative

Abstract

Educational evaluation is a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information to assess the achievement of educational goals and improve the learning process and management of educational units. This article examines the concept of educational evaluation, its urgency in quality governance, and its effectiveness in driving improvements in educational quality. The discussion emphasizes the differences between evaluation and measurement and assessment, the various approaches (formative–summative, internal–external), and the requirements for evaluation to have a real impact: improvement-oriented, based on valid data, stakeholder involvement, and planned follow-up. The article also examines implementation challenges such as bias, achievement reductionism, administrative burden, and a "just report" culture. In conclusion, evaluation is effective when positioned as an organizational learning instrument that guides decisions, not merely an accountability ritual.

References

AERA, APA, & NCME. (2018). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992

Arikunto, Suharsimi, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,

2013.

Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brown, G. T. L., & Abdulnabi, H. H. A. (2017). Evaluating the quality of higher education instructor-constructed multiple-choice tests: Impact on student grades. Frontiers in Education, 2, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00024

Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28.

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Leading professional learning with impact. School Leadership & Management, 39(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1530892

Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Hopfenbeck, T. N., et al. (2015). Balancing accountability and improvement: Learning from international experiences in test-based accountability. Assessment in Education, 22(3), 309–323.

Jalaluddin. (1994). Filsafat pendidikan Islam. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kane, M. T. (2016). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1060192

Koretz, D. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 36(3), 7–15.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kurniawan, Syamsul. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Sebuah Kajian Komprehensif.

Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2016.

Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2016). Accountabilities in schools and the problem of numbers. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(6), 543–556.

Makhsin, M. (2023). The Role of Muhasabah in Enhancing Community Solidarity in Islamic Society. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 1390–1393.

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate? Teachers College Record, 118(11), 1–40.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Masykur, A., Sunanto, S., & Surya, A. (2020). Social Engagement and Its Effect on Community Development in Islamic Context. Journal of Islamic Management Studies, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.34105/jims.v7i1.543

Nata, Abudin. Filsafat Pendidikan Islam, Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 2005.

OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 745–761.

Reardon, S. F. (2016). School segregation and racial academic achievement gaps. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 34–57.

Riinawati, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Yogyakarta: Thema Publishing,2021), 91.

Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 17(2), 101–122.

Salleh, M. (2023). Reflection as a Tool for Teacher Self-Assessment in Islamic Education.

Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Ebbeler, J., & Pieters, J. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20, 283–325.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003, October). The CIPP model for evaluation: An update, a review of the model’s development, a checklist to guide implementation [Conference paper]. Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN), Portland, OR.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Zed, M. (2004). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Mohamad Toha, Munirah Munirah, & Siti Mulkiyah. (2026). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Antara Konsep, Urgensi dan Efektivitasnya dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Multidisciplinary: Journal of Education an Learning, 1(2), 95–101. Retrieved from https://multidisciplinary.intakepustaka.com/index.php/multidisiplin/article/view/16

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.